Do you think defendants should have be found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt to be convicted? or do you think a lesser burden of proof, like the preponderance of evidence in needed in civil cases, is more appropriate?

Which of the following forests would the wilderness act of 1964 most effectively protect from harmful logging? i. a forest containing several service roads ii. a forest through which a highway has been constructed iii. a forest that has never been affected by human development a. i only b. ii only c. iii only d. i and ii only e. i and iii only