Which was a result of westward expansion in the united states?
threat of war by british colonial officials
war with french settlers
the end of class conflict on the east coast
forced migration of native americans
which was a reason for japan’s successful modernization?
reinstatement of a powerful shogunate
creation of u. s.-style federalism
generation of higher crop yields
avoidance of western domination
which was a key event associated with the mexican revolution of 1911 to 1920?
santa anna’s defeat in the mexican-american war caused mutiny and rebellion at home.
government forces ambushed and killed rebel leader zapata who led peasants in revolution.
napoleon iii attempted to re-create a french-controlled mexican absolute monarchy.
juárez instituted la reforma to limit the power of the military and the catholic church.
which best describes the impact of urbanization?
shrinking middle class suburbs
lack of readily available food
unsanitary living conditions
loss of agricultural output
which was not a reason for the decline of the ottoman empire?
inept political alliances
humiliating military defeats
decrease in maritime trade
territorial losses

safety professionals realize that high-dexterity gloves result in increased safety and job performance. corporate managers know that increased safety reduces costs while increased performance enhances productivity, both of which boost the bottom line. that being said, why do we still see so many work sites where gloves are not mandated ppe or where gloves are mandated but compliance falls short of expectations? after all, the most important tools for every employee are his brains, eyes, and hands--he can't work without all three of them functioning properly.

hard hats and safety glasses top the list of required ppe at most work sites, but gloves fall to a distant third or fourth. and even when gloves are mandated, they're often found on the ground more than on employees' hands. why is that?

the reason is that lack of hand dexterity has historically made gloves too cumbersome to work in. if an employee can't adequately control the tools he or she is working with--if he can't feel the details of the metal pipe, wood beam, parcel package, machine screw, airplane wing, concrete block, pine log, steel girder, or engine part that he's handling--then the gloves themselves pose an even higher risk of injury than not wearing any gloves at all.

the lack of mandated hand protection (and the lack of compliance when it is mandated) is a direct result of traditional gloves' preventing workers from effectively and safely performing their jobs. if linda's gloves are too cumbersome to allow her to position a set of steel springs with one hand and pneumatically staple them to a mattress frame with the other hand, she's just not going to wear them. can you blame her?

in a nutshell, the lack of dexterity in gloves has prevented them from becoming universally required and accepted hand protection. and that's a sad thing, because no matter how talented you are at the job you perform, you can't work with injured hands.

i dont quit undertsand, i'm just here for the okie dokey!

spa spa spa