Explain how the supreme court's power should be expressed by rulings exemplifying ( use an example of) either judicial activism or judicial restraint

Supreme court power expressed by rulings:

The supreme court's powers are expressed by both Judicial activism as well as Judicial restraint. Judicial Activism describes a class to a judicial ruling that is based mostly on the personal aspects which extend beyond the constitution and its rules. In this, the judge issues a ruling that neglects the legal precedents based on the constitution to sustain a political view.

We can also describe it as the judge's genuine approach towards the case. An example of judicial activism is the desegregation of public schools in the United States in 1954. Judicial activism shows that the supreme court is a body that is independent of any external force.Judicial restraint is the exact opposite of judicial activism. Here, the supreme court follows the constitutional rules instead of supporting a political view that lies beyond the constitution.

ek = (m.v2) / 2

v - velocity of system after the collision

m = m1 + m2

ek = (m1 + m2) v2/2

ek = (200 + 250) 2,32/2 = 450*5,29/2 = 1190,25 j

by: nicholas dooley

if triangle abc is congruent to triangle def, their interior angles are congruent, because congruent parts of congruent triangles are congruent (cpctc).

that means ∠d is congruent to ∠a; ∠d is equal to 8x - 2.

interior angles of all triangles add to equal 180 degrees, so you can set the sum of these interior angle values equal to 180 and solve for x.

180 = (8x - 2) + 22 + 72

180 = 8x - 2 + 22 + 72

180 = 8x + 92

88 = 8x

11 = x

x = 11