Alaw professor writes an article for a legal journal. the article opposes judicial review, arguing that the final decision on the constitutionality of a law should rest with the legislature, which represents the people, rather than with the unelected justices of the supreme court.

which of the following statements best counters this argument?

a. the supreme court is composed of a balance of political viewpoints, which forces consensus, as opposed to the legislature, whose shifting party composition lacks political consistency.
b. the constitution gives the supreme court the power of judicial review to maintain the balance among governmental branches.
c. legal decisions made by unelected judges and based on the constitution provide greater national stability than those based on the changing opinions of the electorate.
d. the lifetime tenure of supreme court justices makes them better qualified to decide matters of long-term consequence than elected officials.

Hey this is your answer

If you are talking about typical sand you would find at the beach or in a river bed here on earth, there are some differences. i would say the first biggest difference is in composition and mineral make up. although the moon is largely made of the same materials as earth’s mantle and surface, the moon experiences very little weathering (no liquid water and virtually no atmosphere). “earth” sand is typically composed mostly of quartz grains. this is because quartz is highly resistant to both physical and chemical weathering. most of the other minerals originally with the quartz are broken down into fine clay and carried away, chemically eroded/ dissolved, or some combination of the two. this usually leaves only the quartz behind, and so most of the time when you see/think of sand, you are talking about quartz. without these weathering mechanisms on the moon, the “sand” (which is likely more silt or clay sized grains anyways) would consist of mostly other minerals like anorthosite, olivine, and proxene.

: )

Answerpersonal distress