Choose 1 of the questions and provide a complete answer in the text box. You can answer either one

1. Explain the meaning of "semi-barbaric" and why it's a perfect adjective to describe both the King and the Princess. How can someone be half cruel, brutal and uncivilized, and half not?

2. Stockton begs the question: "Which came out of the opened door,--the lady, or the tiger?" Write a 1-2 paragraph argument for which choice the Princess ended up making, and why.

the story is
The Lady, or the Tiger?
Frank R. Stockton

I will give brainiest please help

In this case, I will choose the first question.

The story "The Lady, or the Tiger?" is a short story that describes a fictional place. In this place, the King is "semi-barbaric." The main reason why the king is described in this way is because the king can be quite cruel to his people, but can also propose progressive, positive ideas. This duality is expressed throughout the story. It is also seen in the character of the princess. The princess is half-barbaric, as she is hot-tempered and jealous. However, she is also in love and is very passionate, which are positive qualities.

It is possible for someone to be half cruel while also being half not. In the story, this is explained by the fact that these "barbarians" received some influence from the Romans, making them more civilized. However, this can also be explained by the fact that humans are naturally complex. They have various sides to them, and are equally capable of great things and of negative things. This is evident in the story.

i do agree with robert moses’ statements about wiping out cities that are an “impediment to new growth”. in order to have a positive community, the city must continue to grow either in terms of size or economics. therefore wiping out cities that restrict growth benefits the overall society and all the people living in it. similar to a social contract, i believe that if a person was to live in a community they must sacrifice some of their rights, in this case property, for the overall good of the people. as long as these people living in the cities are reimbursed and the purpose of wiping out the cities is to serve the public, there is no problem with robert moses’ core idea.