Why do correlations enable prediction, but not cause-effect explanation?
(Ap Psychology)

Give an example of a situation in which an individual's pursuit of economic self-interest may not benefit but instead harm the rest of society

On a certain portion of an experiment, a statistical test result yielded a p-value of 0.18. what can you conclude? 2(0.18) = 0.36 < 0.5; the test is not statistically significant. if the null hypothesis is true, one could expect to get a test statistic at least as extreme as that observed 18% of the time, so the test is not statistically significant. if the null hypothesis is true, one could expect to get a test statistic at least as extreme as that observed 82% of the time, so the test is not statistically significant. 0.18 > 0.05; the test is statistically significant. p = 1 - 0.18 = 0.82 > 0.05; the test is statistically significant.

Look back at act iv scene v to read over ophelia’s interactions with claudius and gertrude as well as laertes. then, compare her dialogue to hamlet’s dialogue and soliloquies previously analyzed in acts i–iv. what is ophelia’s state of mind versus hamlet’s?