Why might some people be opposed to the use of biotechnology? A) It can lead to the development of resistant microorganisms.
B) It can lead to competition between modified and native organisms.
C) It can lead to the production of toxic materials.
D) All of the above

D) All of the above

Explanation:

Biotechnology has come a long way in the last 2 decades and has brought quite some good. But with that good came from bad as well as the potential for bad.

One of those is that in finding new ways to improve on biological processes, biotechnology could create resistant microorganisms that will affect humanity adversely until stronger medication is introduced.

Modified organisms will also compete with native organisms for dominance and will probably win due to enhancements which will affect the ecosystem. Toxic materials could also be produced and introduced into human food supply which would be very harmful.  

i do agree with robert moses’ statements about wiping out cities that are an “impediment to new growth”. in order to have a positive community, the city must continue to grow either in terms of size or economics. therefore wiping out cities that restrict growth benefits the overall society and all the people living in it. similar to a social contract, i believe that if a person was to live in a community they must sacrifice some of their rights, in this case property, for the overall good of the people. as long as these people living in the cities are reimbursed and the purpose of wiping out the cities is to serve the public, there is no problem with robert moses’ core idea.