In the 18th, 19th, and early 20th centuries, a wide variety of resistance movements across Asia and Africa fought against European imperialism. These movements reflected a range of organizational principles, from traditional kingdoms to religious movements to guerrilla nationalists. Develop an argument that compares at least two resistance movements in terms of their values, organization, and effectiveness at achieving their goals.
ANSWER NEEDS TO BE IN ESSAY FORMAT
In your response, you should do the following:

Respond to the prompt with a historically defensible thesis or claim that establishes a line of reasoning
Describe a broader historical context relevant to the prompt
Use specific, relevant evidence to support an argument in response to the prompt
Use historical reasoning (e. g., comparison) to frame or structure an argument that addresses the prompt
Use evidence to corroborate, qualify, or modify an argument that addresses the prompt

Sudan revolts against India's independence movement. In each approach, these two movements are diametrically opposed. Sudanese protests were shocked by faith and dispensed with violence. The initiators of the religious-sponsored movement intend to overthrow France and exclude France from places where Sudan has a coalition government. The recent Indian removal act, on the opposite hand, didn't pursue a violent course. The key varieties of resistance were political violence and peaceful demonstrations.

Quality and loyalty drive India's independence movement. As a result, one movement used aggressive and radical ways, whereas the opposite used civil resistance and loyalty. till the last half of the 20th century, the center east was a locality of Colonial powers. It achieved independence as a results of the Second war, that raged in Europe from 1939 to 1945. Europe was terribly fragile within the political and economic spheres when the war.

As countries' economies have weakened, movements for African national independence have reemerged. Protests became additional common within the Nineteen Sixties, and plenty of European countries peacefully granted freedom to the colonies. when prolonged battles between native and colonial powers, however territorial freedom became way more victorious. Until the second half of the twentieth century, the African region was a colony of European powers. It gained independence as a result of the Second World War, which raged in Europe from 1939 to 1945.

Europe was very fragile in the political and economic spheres after the war. As countries economies have weakened, campaigns for African national independence have resurfaced. Protests became more common in the 1960s, and many European countries peacefully granted freedom to the colonies. After extended battles between tribes and colonists, however territorial freedom had become more successful. In 1877, Britain gained complete control over India.

As a result, full colonization started with the introduction of british Educational institutions such as universities, mailing systems, railroads, and upper class clubs into Indian land.Hindus have the opportunity to study at English universities; but, Hindus who have passed from English universities quickly understand that they are servicing the destroyer and letting down the people to whom they belong and love. With the help of British liberal democrats as well as those who questioned the English establishment, these college students formed the Indian National Congress in 1885. Gandhi and other nonviolent revolutionaries toured the world preaching nonviolent resistance to the British. As a result of his belief that independence could be achieved without violence, Gandhi was able to bring India together.

Explanation:

please use quillbot

i think the answer is b or c.

by: nicholas dooley