I propose a hypothetical situation, you are present with a object which can kill criminals, citizens and other people, by reading the rules of the objects you find that you need a name and a face of the person you wish to die. You decide that many people deserve to be judged and you kill 4 people every day, 6 on Saturday and Sundays over a 3 year period. So you decide to do the righteous thing and kill; criminals, convicts and other assorted wrong doers.

What should your punishment be if they were already going die or be convicted again? And what would be the total death toll?

In a recent telephone survey, 5,000 randomly selected teenagers were asked to cite their primary social network site. six of 10 teenagers said they use mybook as their primary social network site. a 95% confidence interval to estimate the true proportion of teenagers who use mybook as their primary social network site is found to be (0.2964, 0.9036). which of the following is a correct interpretation of the confidence level? ninety-five percent of all samples of this size would yield a confidence interval of (0.2964, 0.9036). there is a 95% chance that the true proportion of teenagers who use mybook as their primary social network site is in the interval (0.2964, 0.9036). ninety-five percent of the time, the procedure used to generate this interval will capture the true proportion of teenagers who use mybook as their primary social network site. ninety-five percent of all the samples of size 5,000 lie in the confidence interval (0.2964, 0.9036).

Sorry about those weird questions my ipad is acting weird

Which of the following is a type of public speaking