In buckley v valeo the supreme court said that when it ruled that campaign spending is an expression of free speech.

a) "money is speech"
b) "sending is private"
c) "donors have no influence"
d) "speech costs money"

The Correct Answer is A

Explanation:

A 1976 lawsuit in which the Supreme Court looked underneath the share of the Federal Election Campaign Act that placed boundaries on the quantity of financiers individuals could donate to their operations. The conclusion of the preponderance was that arranging such conclusions was a breach of open expression.

Extrusive;

The answer is    (d) 7/2======we have    we also  have an integral      notice how function f splits up at x = 0. there's a left piece and a right pieceso we'll need to do the same thing with our integral: split it at x = 0we use a property of integrals that allows us to split up and sum:     notice that for the piecewise function f, the function has the equationf(x) = x when x  ≤ 0. so for the integral  , f(x) = x so it changes into      for the piecewise function f, the function has the equationf(x) = x+1  when x  > 0. for the integral  , we have    therefore, back to our splitted integral: