The author of the article, leanne cole shares two photos that she took. she concludes that only the first one the home built in the 30s, could be considered ‘fine art’. why do you think that is?

1.The author of the article, Leanne Cole, shares two photos that she took. She concludes that only the first one, the home built in the 30's, could be considered 'fine art'. Why do you think that is?The first photo is more likely to be considered fine art because there is an idea and emotion that it is clearly trying to convey. I think this because I felt the thought process and emotion in it a lot more than the second one. I look at the second one and think, wow what a nice picture. 2.Although Cole states in the article that there does not seem to be a clear definition of fine art photography, she states there are things that can help define it. What are these things, according to the article?The things that can help define fine art photography are the artist's vision, the idea, technique, body of work, and artist statement.3. How does what this article defines as 'fine art photography' differ from what you learned in this unit? Did you feel that this article was useful?

Explanation:

I think that the first photo is more likely to be fine art because there is emotion that you can see she clearly tried to convey. I think this because I feel like the emotion is stronger in the first photo than in the second photo.

the ingredients listed on a label are listed by amount. the ingredient there is the most of is listed first and it trickles down to the ingredient there is the least of.

personally, i think the games do because it's actually them controlling it. this might cause them to think it's okay to do it for real. as for animated movies i think they are mostly fine because they're animated. also, animation has come a long way causing animated movies to become more real but 30 years ago this wouldn't be as big of a problem as today.