Explain the difference between a work of art intended for documentation and one intended for commemoration. how can a work of art, intended as a documentation, become also a piece of commemoration?

The art intends to document an event, or a governor's achievement or something related to politics is a portrait with specific elements such as the precise recreation of the events, sometimes praising and modifying some points of what happened. Depending on the event portrayed, the artist can be direct and just retell the historical moment. It's not the kind of canvas that is open to be enjoyable (dark themes, hard light, direct composition). On the other hand, the commemorative art intends to be fun, to portray the event to show the victory of something or someone, with bright colors, a soft light, and the composition of the canvas follows the idea to put the audience among the characters portrayed. I think that documentation art becomes a commemorative one when the events and the person who fought there became legends when they change something in History.

Explanation:

where and what are the statements?

i'm not too sure - if you could attach the picture