Imagine that you see a piece of art that makes you angry or uncomfortable. Is that a successful piece of art? No, art should be pleasing.

No, anger has no place in art.

Yes, if it is technically well done.

Yes, the point is to evoke a response.

Idon’t think it’s true but if it is then you should make up a case then prove it

Well, in the music industry during the 80s  cyndi lauper took a risk in changing a certain type of music art into something creative with her hair dye and wild hairstyles that were bold, her style was entice and screeching that she actually did her get a lot of hate for it because at that time hair dye and crazy patterns wasn't the norm girl's just wanna have fun for example that changed the work of her genre and a lot of people were influenced by her ways. there was other people who took the dare but not a lot. that itself refers to change in art style, because modern times changed.