where do you stand on the debate in photojournalism about what is "too much" manipulation of a digital photo? At what point do you feel that manipulation renders a photo no longer a factual record? discuss and see explain.

Answer and Explanation:

The manipulation makes a photo stop being factual, if the photo is manipulated to the point of having completely transformed parts, preventing the visualization of essential details and/or presenting added details that did not exist and were created to generate a lying narrative .

In this case, a photo remains factual when the manipulation commits itself, only, to improve the image quality and highlight important elements, without promoting the suppression of other elements.

including the octave, the answer would 8 notes in a major scale with one note being played twice. ex) c major scale includes: c, d, e, f, g, a, b, c

notice that c is played twice

however, if you were to ask me how many different notes are in a major scale- the answer would be 7.