Why are there more debates answers when discussing stem cell research

Hello, Lead082656. The debates of the embryonic stem cell research are pretty heavy to digest. There's always two sides to the debate: do not destroy a human life to research it and the other one would be to take the stem cells of the embryo and find a cure for other people's diseases and illnesses. More people want to argue the first one instead of the second one, which is why there is more debating going on instead of research. I hope I helped

(These are sample answers so I don't recommend copy and paste)

Scientists do not fully understand how stem cells proliferate and differentiate.

There are ethical concerns debated when using embryonic stem cells for research.

Scientists do not know the signals used by stem cells and if they are similar when forming specialized cells; they are unable to grow specialized and unspecialized cells in the lab.

It is a newer technology with many questions left to answer.

false because ozone (o3) depletion does not cause global warming, but both of these environmental problems have a common cause: human activities that release pollutants into the atmosphere altering it.

global warming is caused primarily by putting too much carbon dioxide into the atmosphere when coal, oil, and natural gas are burned to generate electricity or to run our cars.

explanation:

as in mitosis, dna replication occurs during interphase.   in meiosis, it occurs specifically in s phase of interphase 1.