Which best compares habitat preservation and laws that protect biodiversity? a) hábitat preservation usually protects only individual species, while laws protect entire ecosystems. b) laws usually protect only certain species, while habitat preservation protects entire ecosystems. c) only hábitat preservation has been shown to actually protect biodiversity. d) only laws have been shown to actually protect biodiversity.

The answer to your question is,

B) Laws usually protect only certain species, while habitat preservation protects entire ecosystems.

-Mabel <3

B) Laws usually protect only certain species, while habitat preservation protects entire ecosystems.

Laws usually protect only certain species, while habitat preservation protects entire ecosystems is a correct explanation for comparison between habitat preservation and laws that protect biodiversity because laws will only support the protection of the endangered species, banning upon the misuse of a endangered species for any purpose by human society, whereas the habitat preservation will help in protection of the entire ecosystem in which the endangered species and other species are living. This will ensure an overall environmental protection to the biodiversity. Therefore, habitat preservation is better approach over the implementation of laws that protect biodiversity in preserving and protecting biodiversity.

unicellular organisms, like bacteria, are able to perform all life functions within one single cell. multicellular organisms need many different types of cells to carry out the same life processes. each of these special types of cells has a different structure that it perform a specific function.