How might the collapse of the carboniferous rainforests have affected earths carbon cycle? a. the loss of vegetation would have decreased the total amount of carbon in earths carbon cycle. b. over time, the decaying vegetation would have absorbed a large amount of carbon dioxide from the atmosphere. c. over millions of years, decaying vegetation would have been buried and its carbon turned into fossil fuels. d. the total amount of carbon in the carbon cycle would have increased as the vegetation decayed.

The images show the wings of a bat and a bee. from this evidence, what can you conclude about the evolutionary relationship between these organisms? a. the wing structures of the bat and the bee are different, indicating they didn’t inherit wings from a common ancestor. b. the wing structures of the bat and the bee are different, indicating they inherited wings from a common ancestor. c. the functions of bat wings and bee wings are the same, indicating they obtained wings from a common ancestor. d. the functions of bat wings and bee wings are different, indicating they didn’t obtain wings from a common ancestor.

Suppose a suitcase has a mass of (m) 30 kg and a net force (n) of 10 kg*m/s. what is the acceleration rate of the suitcasein m/s? show your work to support your answer

Which would be the most useful source of evidence to support mcneill's contention?