Agroup of scientists studying the dna of two hominids concludes the hominids have a common evolutionary ancestor. which of the following would best support the validity of their conclusion? (1 point)independent teams reviewing their work and arriving at the same conclusionexplaining their experimental procedures in detailproposing explanations for evidence that contradicts their conclusionpublication of their research in a popular magazinequestion 2(05.03 mc)which of the following correctly explains why scientists believe that great apes like chimpanzees and gorillas are more closely related to humans than monkeys on an evolutionary timeline? (1 point)apes are larger than monkeys and have long legs and no tails. apes have smaller brains than monkeys and are less social than monkeys. monkeys have larger brains th

1. The correct answer is option A, Independent teams reviewing their work and arriving at the same conclusion

Reason:

Usually, a scientist publishes their findings in a famous journal to establish its worth publication in magazines is not worthy, like wise explanation of their experimental procedures in detail also of no worthiness until unless it is published somewhere and Proposing explanations for evidence that contradicts their conclusion  can be part a of the experimental outlier but it cannot be be a full proof explanation of research. Thus option A, " Independent teams reviewing their work and arriving at the same conclusion" is the best way to verify the study.

2. The correct answer is option

Apes have long legs and no tales. They are also larger than monkeys.

the answer is true when observing or determining population size, a direct observation is use, in which each organism is counted in a population or in an area. one benefit of this measure is that you get the exact population count but it will take a long time to  determine  the  size  of a  population.