Me out with this

you!
for question 2, i think its 2000 but correct me if i'm wrong.

Image 1 -

The carrying capacity is just as the name suggests, the maximum number of individuals that can make up a population.

Why are the others wrong?

Migration might change the carrying capacity, depending on where the species go, it can increase or decrease, but it's not the only way. A - Wrong.

It can actually be for any type of species, no matter what their distribution type is. B - Wrong.

The survivorship patter doesn't actually matter, and it really doesn't have much to do with the carrying capacity. C - Wrong.

It can vary from population to population, depending on their reproduction rate and their location (amount of resources available). D - Wrong.

Why is E. right?

It's the only one that provides us with truthful information, in a way that makes sense. If enironmental conditions change, it might not affect a population directly.

Let's say, it's a dear population. If it gets too cold, the plants they feed on might die, and they will not have food, but the cold isn't affecting them directly - they will not die because of the cold itself, but because of what the cold will do to their food.

E.

Image 2 -

The growth pattern we see is called logistic growth - the population grows until the carrying capacity and then stabilizes.

Since they give us a chart with a logistic growth, basing oursefls on the definition above, the limit of the growth line will be the carrying capacity of the population, therefore, 2000.

200.

Hope it helped,

BioTeacher101

wait any answer choices plz

thinking it would be physical characteristics