One implicit assumption when using the capture-recapture method to estimate the size of a population is that the capture process is truly random, with all individuals having the same likelihood of being captured. sometimes that is not true, and some individuals are more prone to capture than others. if that were the case, would the capture-recapture method be likely to underestimate or overestimate the size of the population?

one comes through sex and the other does not lul im not

answer; i believe that the correct answer is (lung);

there is no

explanation:

small, big, or no change could occur in the phenotype. it could cause something as simple as a cats ears to curl backwards or something as frighting as death. it could also occur in the protien-coding area and have an effect on that but no effect on the amino acids. what has to occur is a changing in the hox gene or the control gene.