In which situation would it be least likely for a scientist to revise her experimental methods?
it het results support her hypothesis
if her data do not support her hypothesis
no conclusions can be drawn from the data
results are the same after repeating the procedure

results are the same after repeating the procedure

Explanation:

The realization of a scientific experiment involves the manipulation of different variables that, according to scientists, are the cause of the phenomenon to be confirmed. Thanks to experiences, theories tend to find factual support and causal explanations. However, for an experiment to be validated, a whole process of observation and review of several factors is necessary.

Scientists should review their experimental methods for several moments, to make sure that their experiment will give a true and concrete result. This review should be done when: the results confirm your hypothesis, if your data does not support your hypothesis and if no conclusions can be drawn from the data. However, when the results are the same after repeating the procedure, a review is not necessary; generally, several revisions have already been made until the experiment reaches this point.

yes!

explanation:

because it has a type of fat that can make you extremely sick

blue

light-years

magnitude