subject
Biology, 25.09.2019 16:30 rina62

The following evidence from the article was gathered to support the idea that the development of immunotherapy is groundbreaking in the area of cancer treatment.
cancer immunotherapy is an emerging branch of medicine that calls on our immune systems to act as intermediaries in the battle against a tumor.
cancer immunotherapies are less harmful to human tissue than traditional treatments like radiation and classic chemotherapy, which reduces the likelihood of unmanageable side effects.
today, immunotherapies based on allison and honjo's research are approved for treating melanoma, bladder cancer, colorectal cancer, liver cancer and lung cancer — though this represents a small slice of tumor-related diseases experienced by patients.
is this evidence adequate support for the idea? why or why not?
a
yes; it shows that immunotherapy is easier for patients to manage than traditional cancer treatments.
b
no; it does not go into detail about what kinds of unmanageable side effects other treatments create.
c
yes; it shows that immunotherapies are more successful at killing cancer cells quickly than other treatments.
d
no; it does not make a valid comparison between immunotherapy and traditional cancer treatments.

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on Biology

question
Biology, 21.06.2019 18:30
Select all the true statements about the cosmic microwave background radiation
Answers: 2
question
Biology, 22.06.2019 11:00
The relationship between intron and exon
Answers: 1
question
Biology, 22.06.2019 17:30
98 points you will be galileo perform the experiment to determine if objects with different mass fall at the same, or different, rates in the air and in a vacuum. before you conduct your experiment, you need to form a hypothesis. a hypothesis is a prediction of what you think will happen in the experiment. the hypothesis is a statement that describes “if” a certain set of circumstances are present “then” there will be a specific result that will occur. record your hypothesis here: record the results from step one of the experiment (dropping the objects in the air): first trial: second trial: third trial: record the results from step two of the experiment (dropping the objects in a vacuum): first trial: second trial: third trial: did the experiment support your hypothesis? using the data from your experiment, describe why you believe your hypothesis was either proven or disproven. what forces were acting on the objects dropped in the air? what force was acting on the objects dropped in the vacuum? part two: comparing forces choose two forces and compare and contrast these forces. you must provide two ways that they are alike and two ways that they are different. you may make a list, write in paragraph form, or make a chart. choose two forces and compare and contrast these forces. these must be different forces than used in the prior question. provide two ways that they are similar and two ways that they are different. you may make a list, write it out, or make a chart.
Answers: 1
question
Biology, 22.06.2019 18:40
Does solar energy ever run out? brainliest
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
The following evidence from the article was gathered to support the idea that the development of imm...
Questions
Questions on the website: 13722360