To genetically transform an entire organism, you must insert the new gene into every cell in the organism. which organism is better suited for complete and total genetic transformation— one composed of many cells, or one composed of a single cell? why?

The answer is an unicellular organism.

Explanation:

There are many reasons why unicellular organisms, like bacteria, are better for understanding mutations. First of all, as there's only one cell, the amount of DNA is less, and therefore, easier to completely change. Also, unicellular organisms reproduce faster and without recombination, in most cases. Meaning that the mutation or change will be inherited doubtlessly.

i'd think it's paralell

both anaerobic and aerobic respiration use glucose (or other carbohydrates), proteins and lipids to produce atp and nadh. cell uses those energy molecules, obtained from food and   breaks them down during the chemical reactions of respiration. in anaerobic respiration, nadh is regenerated to nad+ by enzymes lactate dehydrogenase (lactate is produced, e.g. in muscle cells) or by alcohol dehydrogenase where ethanol is produced (alcohol fermentation), while in aerobic respiration, electrons from nadh are deposited in the mitochondria to regenerate nad+ (electron transport chain. anaerobic respiration produces 2 atp per molecule of glucose compared to aerobic respiration where about 38 atp molecules are produced.