The big bird and his descendants are a rare glimpse at how a natural hybridization event can form a new lineage from two species that live in the same area. however, there is not yet scientific consensus about whether the big bird lineage should be considered its own species. there is evidence for and against its classification as a separate species using the biological species concept as your guide, sort the following observations based on whether thay support the notion that the big bird lneage is a separat ey support the notion that the big bird lineage is a separate species or whether they refute the notion that it is a separate species. wtherthey rfute the notion

me two

explanation:

because i hate it

"1. it should be, it has been for about 20 years, and it's really not much different in the end than breeding animals to have particular traits. there are always concerns about genetically engineered animals/plants affecting the environment in unexpected negative ways, but i can't think of an example where the fears didn't turn out to be baseless.  

first, as you point out, it would be a great advance in pharmacology, to be able to tailor drugs and their doses to me. the pros involve better medical treatment. the cons involve privacy issues like insurance companies denying coverage to people with genetic risk factors. looking at dna markers wouldn't affect the frequency of genetic diseases, but it would allow detection of them earlier. and ok, actually i suppose that if people used this information to avoid having children with genetic diseases, some might decrease in frequency."

sheep is a herbivore animal whereas grasshopper belongs to the class chordates but both of them feed on greens.  

if grasshopper and sheep feeding on a pasture land, i do not think both of them will have any impact on each other. however, the number of the species can make difference. since sheep feed on greens, there is a possibility there left no pasture land for the grasshoppers or they may get extinct.