Scientists often work on projects for a long time and fail to see sources of error in their research. which process allows an outside expert to look at the scientist's project and point to sources of error? direct funding peer review conclusive research data collection sodium oxygen

The correct answer is peer review.

Explanation:

A peer review can be described as the evaluation of somebody's research work by any other person who is also expert in that field. In the field of research, a peer review is very important because often a scientist would be so occupied with work that he might forget to look at his work from certain other aspects. Hence, to prove the validity of a scientist's research it must be checked by other scientists of that field too.

The answer is peer review

Explanation:

I did not just copy i just took the test and the person already explained why so Good Luck I hope this helps :) !!!

thermophiles, notice the prefix thermo.

every el niño cycle is different. every year.