Which should a scientist conclude about data that are inconsistent with the current, scientific understanding of amphibian reproduction?
question 6 options:

a new idea or theory should be devised to fit the new data.

inconsistencies in the data warrant further investigation.

the data are flawed and should be discarded or ignored.

the data reflect the flaws in the current, scientific ideas.

Which should a scientist conclude about data that are inconsistent with the current, scientific understanding of amphibian reproduction?

Inconsistencies in the data warrant further investigation.

Explanation:

the cytokine-activated janus kinase (jak)-signal transducer and activator of transcription (stat) pathway has an important role in the control of immune responses. dysregulation of jak-stat signaling is associated with various immune disorders.

the "dirty dozen" chemicals banned in an international treaty are formally known as persistent organic pollutants, or pops. the united nations environment program provided this background on what they are and what they can do to humans and wildlife.

i hope this