Identify the statements that are features of a promoter. In prokaryotes, the promoter contains a –35 and –10 region upstream of the transcription start site. In eukaryotes, the promoter is recognized by a sigma factor subunit, which must bind to the promoter before forming the preinitiation complex. In both prokaryotes and eukaryotes, the promoter is located in the 5 ′ direction, upstream from the transcription start site. In eukaryotes, the promoter often contains a TATA box, which is where the TATA‑binding protein binds. In eukaryotes, the promoter attracts the small and large ribosomal subunits with the help of initiation factors.

Compare and contrast the adaptations of free-living flatworms and parasitic flatworms

Which statements best describe the differences or similarities between a comparative investigation and an experimental investigation? check all that apply. experimental investigations are best for showing cause-and-effect relationships, while comparative investigations do not necessarily show this type of relationship. comparative investigations are often impractical and unrealistic, while experimental investigations are the most practical and realistic kinds of investigations. comparative investigations allow for the use of a wide range of variables but do not have a control group, while experimental investigations involve variables that can be controlled. both experimental investigations and comparative investigations are designed to answer scientific questions. both experimental investigations and comparative investigations focus on making observations rather than collecting new data.

Pls in your opinion, what are the limiting factors that might affect the growth or diversity of our ecosystem? respond to this question in claim, evidence, reasoning format. 1. make your claim (i are the limiting factors that might affect the growth or diversity of our 2. follow the claim with 3 pieces of evidence. evidence may be taken from the reading, the videos, previous lessons, or googled answers. site sources, too. 3. use reasoning to explain why you chose your evidence.