In 1998, paleoanthropologist rick potts, of the smithsonian, published an article in the yearbook of physical anthropology, a peer-reviewed journal. the article was titled “environmental hypotheses of hominin evolution.” in his paper, potts provided evidence to support his claim that great variations in environmental conditions over time were responsible for the adaptability of humans and the success of our species. why might this not be the best article to reference?

a. potts has no authority.
b. potts was not objective.
c. the article may not reflect current knowledge.
d. the article was not reviewed by potts’s peers

Option C, The article may not reflect current knowledge.

Explanation:

Pott has explained some thing which has already been established and published several years back by various scientist, researchers, biologist, ecologists and geologist.

Re publishing something again will not bring laurel to Pott, instead his article would not be considered a suitable article for reference.

Also , if pott would have published any thing that talks of a way ahead of those previous publication, even then his article could be referred.

Thus, option C is correct

0 because theres a difference between pickled peppers and peers.

-hope this : -/

the areas around the equator