subject
Biology, 06.05.2020 07:06 dillionmaggio

Two scientists are observing a group of children eating at snack time. After watching the children, Scientist A says the children eat because they are hungry. Scientist B says the children eat because their friends are eating. Which scientist's conclusion is valid? A. Scientist B's conclusion is valid because it is supported by evidence. B. Neither conclusion is valid. Conclusions cannot be drawn from observations. C. Scientist A's conclusion is valid because eating is necessary to stay healthy. D. Both scientists' conclusions could be valid.

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on Biology

question
Biology, 21.06.2019 23:30
In iceland, the mid atlantic ridge runs through the center of the contry. what can you conclude about the apperence of iceland many thousands of years from now?
Answers: 1
question
Biology, 21.06.2019 23:40
1. which of the following is correct regarding opiates/opioids: a. they all have a natural component as a starting pointb. they have low addiction possibilitiesc. methadone binds to some of the same receptorsd. a and care correcte. all are correct
Answers: 1
question
Biology, 22.06.2019 06:40
Which term describes a normal value for something in the body? a.homeostasis b.set point c.feedback loop d.integration center
Answers: 1
question
Biology, 22.06.2019 07:00
What molecules will be best used to compare different species with the exact same sequence of amino acids? why would two species have the same protein even if the molecules in question is different? (hint: transcription to translation to protein).
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Two scientists are observing a group of children eating at snack time. After watching the children,...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 25.06.2019 00:00
Questions on the website: 13722359