Primate communication can be compared to human communication in that:. a. primate communication is very simple and across all the species consists of only a handful of "meaningful" sounds; this is entirely different from human language.
b. although some primates have the ability to transmit meaning from one individual to another, this always happens within a species, never between species; this is similar to humans, since humans do not really understand other animals either.
c. many primates make sounds that seem to be labels for things, like specific food items or specific predators, but primate communication lacks nuance or complexity of any kind; this is unlike human language.
d. for at least some Old World monkeys and apes, communication seems to be very context dependent, and specific sounds can have different meanings by making small changes; this is like human language.

Although some primates have the ability to convey meaning from one individual to another, this always occurs within a species, never between species; this is similar to humans in that humans don't really understand other animals either.

Explanation:

What is written above is correct, since humans and primates can communicate in a rustic or not very expressive way with other animals, but understanding or assuming the intentions between different species.

It has been proven that in addition to the ape, chimpanzee and other species of primates, the dolphin is an animal that uses its own language and has a slight percentage of intelligence.

you didn't give any options but heres what i can tell you: an inference is likely to change based on additional observations. the latter is something that you have seen or sensed using your sensory organs while the former is like a conclusion out from what you have observed.

whats the answer to your question?