Worldwide, about twice as many people eat a plant-based diet as eat a meat-based diet. A plant-based diet requires fewer resources to produce. It takes 28 calories of fossil-fuel energy to produce 1 calorie of protein from meat. In contrast, it takes only 3.3 calories of fossil-fuel energy to produce 1 calorie of protein from grain. With the population continuing to increase, some people believe it may be necessary to give up meat-based diets to ensure that there are enough resources to produce food for all people. Do you think that a plant-based or a meat-based diet is more nutritious, or are they both equally nutritious? Why does a plant-based diet require fewer resources to produce? Do you think people should eat less meat? Why or why not?

hey bro i looked it up on google the structure of the eye-spot in euglena viridie, e. ehrenbergii, and phacus pyriyorme is not as franzé haa described it. the so-called “crystal body” and “lens bodies” were not found in any of the individuals of the species examined by me. as earlier observers have stated, the eye-spot consists simply of a mass of pigment granules arranged in a single layer, and probably embedded in a protoplasmic framework, but the latter could not be seen, and its presence was only inferred from the fact that the pigment granules must be held together in some way, thd the eye-spot as a whole is capable of expansion, and that the pigment granules can be separated from each other.

hope this   and an i get brainlsiest

the framers of the constitution insisted that federal judges be nominated instead of elected due to their desire to have judges above the shifting whims of the masses.

the hope, whether achieved or not, was that federal judges would only be beholden to the law and that by not having judges be elected, they would be protected if that law dictated an outcome that ran counter to popular opinion.

true is the