If antibiotics had not been discovered, how would society most likely have been affected? people would be more likely to die from infections. people would have to worry more about antibiotic-resistant diseases. people would take more preventative measures to avoid getting infections. people would have developed resistance to the diseases that are caused by bacteria.

People would be more likely to die from infections.

Explanation:

If antibiotics had not been discovered, people would be more likely to die from infections.

People would need not worry about the issues of antibiotic resistance if there are no antibiotics in the first place.

No matter how preventive people are from getting bacterial infections, infections cannot be totally prevented because bacteria are everywhere around us.

People would have developed resistance to the disease that are caused by some bacteria but those bacteria would also mutate and cause even stronger disease as evolution is a continuous process.

Hence, the most correct statement is that people would be more likely to die from infections if antibiotics had not been discovered.

the answer is b

explanation:

1: most common garden plants prefer loam — soils with a balance of different-sized mineral particles (approximately 40% sand, 40% silt, and 20% clay) with ample organic matter and pore space. however, some plants grow better in sandy soils, while others are well-adapted to clay soils.

2: available water capacity is the maximum amount of plant available water a soil can provide. it is an indicator of a soil's ability to retain water and make it sufficiently available for plant use. available water capacity is the water held in soil between its field capacity and permanent wilting point.

3: it is the same for all living things (plants and animals). it also includes very tiny organisms that our eyes cannot see. they are known as microorganisms, and include viruses, bacteria and fungi.