Consider a major environmental change (like antibiotics entering a person's body). If there are not organisms in a population that have traits that allow them to still continue to survive to reproduce, what would likely happen to that population?

The population (of the bacteria) will reduce

Explanation:

This question appear a little confusing because of the structure of the second sentence. However, it appears to describe how an antibiotic works. Antibiotics work against bacteria by either making the environment toxic for the bacteria (which kills it) or inhibiting the growth/reproduction of the bacteria. Both patterns will eventually lead a sharp reduction in the population of the bacteria. Even if what the antibiotic does is to inhibit the reproduction of the bacteria, this act provides the body with an opportunity to fight the "unreproductive" remnants of bacteria thereby leading to the reduction of population of the bacteria.

false because ozone (o3) depletion does not cause global warming, but both of these environmental problems have a common cause: human activities that release pollutants into the atmosphere altering it.

global warming is caused primarily by putting too much carbon dioxide into the atmosphere when coal, oil, and natural gas are burned to generate electricity or to run our cars.

explanation: