subject
Biology, 21.01.2021 03:30 linaaaaa7

Does the second statement support the first statement, that all living things had a common ancestry? Explain why or why not. 1st statement: The theory of evolution states that all living things had a single common ancestor.

2nd statement: The translation between mRNA and amino acids is the same for all living things. (For example, the mRNA codon CAG codes for glutamine in all living things.)

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on Biology

question
Biology, 22.06.2019 02:00
How is ribosomal rna useful as a molecular clock? a. a large portion of the dna ring is not vital to structure or function, allowing it to accumulate neutral mutations. b. its rate of mutation increases over time as organisms continue to evolve and differentiate from each other. c. a slow mutation rate makes it useful for determining evolutionary relationships between ancient species. d. it is only found in select organisms, making it easier to compare relationships between species that have it.
Answers: 1
question
Biology, 22.06.2019 06:30
What molecules does hemoglobin decay into over time
Answers: 1
question
Biology, 22.06.2019 08:40
Asquirrel population lives in an area. over many years, a river in that area grows wider and stronger, eventually forming a canyon. the squirrel populations on the two sides of the canyon can no longer mate with each other and ultimately form distinct species. this is an example of
Answers: 1
question
Biology, 22.06.2019 13:20
Which cell organelle is the site for photosynthesis? a. chloroplast b. endoplasmic reticulum c. golgi apparatus d. lysosome
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Does the second statement support the first statement, that all living things had a common ancestry?...
Questions
question
English, 27.09.2020 14:01
question
Chemistry, 27.09.2020 14:01
question
Mathematics, 27.09.2020 14:01
question
Mathematics, 27.09.2020 14:01
Questions on the website: 13722361