subject
Biology, 07.02.2021 20:40 sadewright21404

R. Scientific errors are factors that could have contributed to the uncertainty in the outcome of your experiment. Could measurements have been more accurate? Could you have performed more trials? Could environmental factors, such as the lab's lighting or temperature, have had an effect? State these possible sources of error and analyze or estimate how much they may have affected your results.

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on Biology

question
Biology, 22.06.2019 09:00
Were you able to observe the nucleolus in any of the cells if so which ones
Answers: 3
question
Biology, 22.06.2019 13:20
There are only about 250,000 known fossil species. true or false
Answers: 2
question
Biology, 22.06.2019 16:00
One reason scientists are trying to develop fuel sources from corn and sugar is because these sources are renewable fossil fuels are being depleted these crops can be widely grown all of the above
Answers: 2
question
Biology, 22.06.2019 16:30
Monarch butterflies have brightly colored orange wings with black patterns on them, making them easily visible to birds that eat butterflies and moths, yet birds rarely eat the monarchs. likewise, the monarch caterpillars are brightly striped yellow and white and black, and they also are rarely eaten by birds, although some wasps will attack them and feed them to their young. what can be inferred from these observations? monarchs must threaten and attack birds, but not wasps. monarchs have a way of discouraging bird predation that does not involve hiding. monarchs’ wings are so colorful that most birds must find them difficult to eat. monarchs lay more eggs than other less conspicuous butterflies.
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
R. Scientific errors are factors that could have contributed to the uncertainty in the outcome of yo...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 29.06.2019 23:30
Questions on the website: 13722360