37. A scientist carries out an experiment. How could she help other scientists judge the validity of her results? (2 points) Use confusing language in her report
Let other scientists closely review her work
Prevent others from seeing her data
O Keep her experimental procedure a secret
0
kindle

Let other scientists closely review her work

Explanation:

Ideally, experiments are carried out by scientists to find solution to an observed problem or provide answer to a scientific question. However, the outcome of experiments are not generally accepted in the world of science until they are peer-reviewed.

Peer review is when other scientists in the same field (peers) with the scientist performing the experiment make a thorough evaluation in order to ascertain its quality as a scholarly research. Hence, in this question, the scientist could help other scientists judge the validity of her results by LETTING OTHER SCIENTISTS CLOSELY REVIEW HER WORK.

emerging idea only occurs as a raw idea that could appear out of nowhere. meanwhile, to reach scientific consensus , that idea must be structured and tested over and over again through various experiments. the scientific consensus transforms the raw idea into idea that is more reliable through the process of scientific elimination.