Passive transport can be explained by which statement?
Particles move randomly.
O Energy is used to move particles.
o Large particles can move into cells.
Particles are moved to areas of higher
concentration.

It must be large particles move into cells, unless there is another option

Explanation:

Passive transport does not require energy, so the first one is incorrect

Particles are moved from areas of high concentration to an area of low concentration, so the last one is also incorrect

So it should be large particles can move into cells, unless of course there is another option

"1. it should be, it has been for about 20 years, and it's really not much different in the end than breeding animals to have particular traits. there are always concerns about genetically engineered animals/plants affecting the environment in unexpected negative ways, but i can't think of an example where the fears didn't turn out to be baseless.  

first, as you point out, it would be a great advance in pharmacology, to be able to tailor drugs and their doses to me. the pros involve better medical treatment. the cons involve privacy issues like insurance companies denying coverage to people with genetic risk factors. looking at dna markers wouldn't affect the frequency of genetic diseases, but it would allow detection of them earlier. and ok, actually i suppose that if people used this information to avoid having children with genetic diseases, some might decrease in frequency."