Why are scientific journals considered a superior resource compared to other sources of scientific information? I NEED HELP

Published scientific papers are much more reliable than other sources of information because they are peer-reviewed. This means that before a paper is accepted and published by a journal, it is sent to at least two experts in the field who either approve, suggest revisions be made, or reject the paper.

Scientific journals are regarded as more superior due to the fact that they are peer reviewed.

What this means is that before a scientific journal would be approved for publishing, it first has to be reviewed by some experts in that scientific field.

What these peers do is to Approve the journal, make suggestion to the work, or they can decide to reject the work if they find it unsatisfactory.

read more on

Scientific journals are generally specialized for distinct academic fields or subdisciplines, and they are the most important way of communicating research findings.

However, Scientific information is concerned with the creation, gathering, categorization, retention, retrieval, interpretation, transmission, and usage of data.

The major difference is that Scientific journals are peer reviewed while scientific information are merely gathering of information.

Learn more about scientific information here:

explanation:

b,bacteria convert nitrates

into nitrogen gas.

d,plants and animals take in

and use nitrogen compounds.

e,bacteria break down waste    

products and return nitrogen  

to the soil.

a,bacteria convert atmospheric

nitrogen to ammonia.

c,bacteria convert ammonia

to nitrites and nitrates.

the answer is d. chordata