All of the following are true of woodlands EXCEPT they tend to have more grasses than forests.
they can be found in the same area as forests.
most of the species that live in forests would not survive in woodlands.
many of the same management principles apply to forests and woodlands.

most of the species that live in forests would not survive in woodlands.

Explanation:

This is not true

they can be found in the same area as forests

Explanation:

ether you haha a forest or a woodland can’t have both at the same time

answer; ///i believe the correct answer is (aids) acquired immune deficiency syndrome;

"1. it should be, it has been for about 20 years, and it's really not much different in the end than breeding animals to have particular traits. there are always concerns about genetically engineered animals/plants affecting the environment in unexpected negative ways, but i can't think of an example where the fears didn't turn out to be baseless.  

first, as you point out, it would be a great advance in pharmacology, to be able to tailor drugs and their doses to me. the pros involve better medical treatment. the cons involve privacy issues like insurance companies denying coverage to people with genetic risk factors. looking at dna markers wouldn't affect the frequency of genetic diseases, but it would allow detection of them earlier. and ok, actually i suppose that if people used this information to avoid having children with genetic diseases, some might decrease in frequency."