What would happen to the microfilaments in a cell if the process of dynamic instability were interrupted so that only polymerization continued?

The irregular progress between moderate development and fast shrinkage in polymeric gatherings is named ''dynamic 
unsteadiness'', a component saw in an assortment of biochemically unmistakable gatherings including microtubules, actin, and their bacterial 
analogs. The presence of this labile period of a polymer has numerous utilitarian outcomes in cytoskeletal flow, and its 
rehashed appearance proposes that it is moderately simple to advance. Here, we consider the insignificant elements for the presence 
of dynamic insecurity by considering a solitary polymorphic fiber that develops by official to a substrate, experiences a conforma- 
tion change, and may unbind as an outcome of the lingering strains initiated by this change. We distinguish two parameters that 
control the stage space of potential outcomes for the fiber: a basic mechanical parameter that portrays the proportion of the 
security qualities along the fiber to those with the substrate (or proportionately the proportion of longitudinal to horizontal collaborations in 
a get together), and an active parameter that portrays the proportion of timescales for development and compliance change. In the 
deterministic breaking point, these parameters serve to outline an area of continuous development from that of crumple. Be that as it may, 
within the sight of confusion in either the basic or the dynamic parameter the development and fall stages can exist together where 
the fiber can develop gradually, shrivel quickly, and change between these stages, in this manner showing dynamic flimsiness. We display 
the window for the presence of dynamic unsteadiness in a stage graph that enables us to measure the evolvability of this labile 
stage.

Iwould say overuse ( but not 100% sure ) in the u.s. we tend to overuse water by leaving it running, throwing it away, taking long showers, etc.