An anthropologist compares the remains of homo neaderthalensis to earlier hominid species, like homo habilis, and to the contemporary and later species homo sapiens. he believes that homo neanderthalensis were the first hominids to bury their dead. what would make this conclusion incorrect?

This conclusion would be incorrect only if there's evidence that some of the other hominids was burying the dead before the Homo neanderthalensis.

In order to have such a claim, the anthropologist will have to have a proof that will confirm that the burial sites of the Homo neanderthalensis are older than the burial sites of any other hominid species. If that is not the case, and there's proof that some of the other hominids have been burying their dead before the Homo neanderthalensis, than the claim will be wrong.

Also, it is very tricky to make a claim like that, because the fossils of the hominids are pretty rare, and that can be a clue that they have been burying the dead since they are so hard to find even though they have all lived until very recently (geologically speaking).

preservation because he preserves part of the land and preserves means save

explanation:

there are mainly three domains in biological classification namely; archaea, bacteria, and eukarya.

archaea includes all the prokaryotic cells which are characterized by their lipid membranes. they have branched hydrocarbon which is attached to glycerol through an ether linkage.

bacteria includes all the prokaryotic cells, the cell membrane of which are made up of the unbranched fatty acid chain. in addition, they are attached to glycerol through an ester bond.

eukarya includes all the eukaryotic cells, that is, the cells contain a nucleus and other membrane-bound cell organelles.

they can be autotrophic as well as heterotrophic, unicellular as well as multicellular

they include kingdoms like protista, plantae, animalia, fungi et cetera.

read more on -

explanation: