Paulo makes the argument that the asteroid strike that likely contributed to the extinction of the dinosaurs was a short-tem environmental change because it happened so quickly. which is the best analysis of paulo’s position? he is correct; it happened in just a few seconds. he is correct; it did not cause any long-term changes. he is incorrect; it caused long-term changes. he is incorrect; impacts are not environmental changes.

He is incorrect, it caused long-term changes.

Explanation:

A short term change is the one which exert a small impact over the environment which could be recover soon. Like drought, volcanic eruption, and pollution. A long term change is the one which exert a large and drastic impact over the environment which either does not recover or takes long time to recover.

The extinction of dinosaur due to asteroid strike is a long-term change because it has wiped large diversity of dinosaurs from earth. This loss was not compensated.

both anaerobic and aerobic respiration use glucose (or other carbohydrates), proteins and lipids to produce atp and nadh. cell uses those energy molecules, obtained from food and   breaks them down during the chemical reactions of respiration. in anaerobic respiration, nadh is regenerated to nad+ by enzymes lactate dehydrogenase (lactate is produced, e.g. in muscle cells) or by alcohol dehydrogenase where ethanol is produced (alcohol fermentation), while in aerobic respiration, electrons from nadh are deposited in the mitochondria to regenerate nad+ (electron transport chain. anaerobic respiration produces 2 atp per molecule of glucose compared to aerobic respiration where about 38 atp molecules are produced.

      n