In a department meeting, javier shares some research on new software he thinks the company should purchase. roger agrees with javier, and goes on to share his experience with the software and offer more insight into why the software would be the best option. in this scenario, roger's behavior would best be classified as a(n) encourager recognition seeker evaluator-critic elaborator

In this scenario, Roger's behaviour would best be classified as an elaborator.

While working in a group each individual contributes in their own ways.

Benne and Sheats defined roles in a group and classified them in three categories. These categories are

1. Task roles : relate to actually achieving the task goals.

2. Personal Roles : relate to the interpersonal relationships between team members. A highly qualified team, when all team members with a high ego will not be able to achieve the desired goal within the deadline.

3.Dysfunctional Roles: do not contribute in any way to a group. They are only interested in serving their own interests and more often than not, are responsible for disruptions and discord within the group.

The right combination of various roles in a group goes a long way in achieving a goal.

The Elaborator is a task role. The Elaborator takes up an idea and gives his views on how that idea might turn out if it is implemented in the given suggestion.

i believe the answer would have to be a dependable person