Asupply shock is a. an increase in potential gdp caused by a government expenditure multiplier, resulting in a leftward shift of the ad curve. b. an increase in both the inflation and the unemployment rates that may sometimes result in a rightward shift of the sras curve. c. an increase in the rate of inflation as a result of expansionary fiscal policy, resulting in a leftward shift of the sras curve. d. a sudden increase in the price of an important natural resource, resulting in a leftward shift of the sras curve. stagflation is a ▼ situation when the economy reaches full employment automatically combination of inflation and recession combination of discretionary and automatic fiscal policy . stagflation occurs when ▼

For fundamental-type variables, list-initialization syntax prevents narrowing conversions that could result in data loss. for fundamental-type variables, list-initialization syntax allows narrowing conversions that could result in data loss.

Nichols inc. manufactures remote controls. currently the company uses a plantminuswide rate for allocating manufacturing overhead. the plant manager is considering switchingminusover to abc costing system and has asked the accounting department to identify the primary production activities and their cost drivers which are as follows: activities cost driver allocation rate material handling number of parts $5 per part assembly labor hours $20 per hour inspection time at inspection station $10 per minute the current traditional cost method allocates overhead based on direct manufacturing labor hours using a rate of $20 per labor hour. what are the indirect manufacturing costs per remote control assuming an method is used and a batch of 10 remote controls are produced? the batch requires 100 parts, 5 direct manufacturing labor hours, and 3 minutes of inspection time.

In december of 2004, the company you own entered into a 20-year contract with a grain supplier for daily deliveries of grain to its hot dog bun manufacturing facility. the contract called for "10,000 pounds of grain" to be delivered to the facility at the price of $100,000 per day. until february 2017, the supplier provided processed grain which could easily be used in your manufacturing process. however, no longer wanting to absorb the cost of having the grain processed, the supplier began delivering whole grain. the supplier is arguing that the contract does not specify the type of grain that would be supplied and that it has not breached the contract. your company is arguing that the supplier has an onsite processing plant and processed grain was implicit to the terms of the contract. over the remaining term of the contract, reshipping and having the grain processed would cost your company approximately $10,000,000, opposed to a cost of around $1,000,000 to the supplier. after speaking with in-house counsel, it was estimated that litigation would cost the company several million dollars and last for years. weighing the costs of litigation, along with possible ambiguity in the contract, what are three options you could take to resolve the dispute? which would be the best option for your business and why?