Business, 24.06.2019 16:00 davidoj13

After extensive negotiations, representatives for an automobile manufacturer and a tire maker orally agreed on the specifications for a supply of tires. the lawyer for the car manufacturer then drafted a written agreement and sent it to the tire maker's lawyer, who modified the draft and sent it back to the car manufacturer. this writing was signed by both parties. the tire maker now brings an action for breach of contract against the car manufacturer seeking damages. the car manufacturer attempts to introduce the testimony of its chief negotiator describing the oral agreement with the tire maker representatives that the tires would meet certain requirements of the car models. the tire maker objects, arguing that the parol evidence rule bars admission of this testimony. which of the following is the best argument supporting admission of the testimony? a the memorandum signed by the parties was not a complete integration of their agreement. b the parol evidence rule does not bar evidence interpreting a written agreement. c the car manufacturer detrimentally relied on the oral agreement in signing the memorandum. d the parol evidence rule does not exclude misrepresentations.

Answers: 2

Show answers

Another question on Business

Business, 22.06.2019 01:00

The penalties for a first-time dui charge include revocation of drivers license a. 180 days b. ben 180 des and one year c. bence 90 and 180 d. one year

Answers: 2

Answer

Business, 22.06.2019 04:00

The simple interest in a loan of $200 at 10 percent interest per year is

Answers: 2

Answer

Business, 22.06.2019 07:30

Most states have licensing registration requirements for child care centers and family daycare homes. these usually include minimum standard for operation. which of the following would you most likely find required in a statement of state licensing standards for child care centers?

Answers: 2

Answer

Business, 22.06.2019 10:50

You are evaluating two different silicon wafer milling machines. the techron i costs $285,000, has a three-year life, and has pretax operating costs of $78,000 per year. the techron ii costs $495,000, has a five-year life, and has pretax operating costs of $45,000 per year. for both milling machines, use straight-line depreciation to zero over the project’s life and assume a salvage value of $55,000. if your tax rate is 24 percent and your discount rate is 11 percent, compute the eac for both machines.

Answers: 3

Answer

You know the right answer?

After extensive negotiations, representatives for an automobile manufacturer and a tire maker orally...

Questions