Michelle fleshner worked for pepose vision institute (pvi), a surgical practice. she was fired after she provided information to the department of labor about pvi’s overtime pay policy. she sued for wrongful termination, and the jury awarded her $125,000. after the trial, a juror told pvi’s attorneys that another juror had made anti-semitic statements during jury deliberations. the comments concerned a witness who testified on pvi’s behalf. according to the juror, the other juror said, about the witness: "she is a jewish witch." "she is a penny-pinching jew." "she was such a cheap jew that she did not want to pay plaintiff unemployment compensation." another juror confirmed the remarks. pvi filed a motion for a new trial on the basis of juror misconduct. the trial judge held that the comments did not prevent a fair trial from occurring. pvi appealed. do you think such comments are sufficient to require a new trial, or must a juror’s bias be discovered during voir dire for it to matter? explain your response in 2-3 paragraphs