Melissa jackson, bookkeeper for kinko company, cannot prepare a bank reconciliation. the bank statement showed a $3,390.77 balance. melissa’s checkbook showed a $3,668.92 balance. melissa placed a $577.80 deposit in the bank’s night depository on june 30, 2015. the deposit did not appear on the bank statement. the bank included two dms and one cm with the returned checks: $987.05 dm for nsf check, $14.60 dm for service charges, and $588.20 cm (less $12.00 collection fee) for collecting a $588.20 non-interest-bearing note. check no. 811 for $178.30 and check no. 912 for $108.80, both written and recorded on june 28, were not with the returned checks. the bookkeeper had correctly written check no. 884, $1,245.00, for a new cash register, but she recorded the check as $1,336.00. the may bank reconciliation showed check no. 748 for $347.00 and check no. 710 for $203.60 outstanding on april 30. the june bank statement included check no. 710 but not check no. 748. complete the june 30, 2015, reconciliation. (input all amounts as positive values. round your answers to 2 decimal places.)

The relationship requirement for qualifying relative requires the potential qualifying relative to have a family relationship with the taxpayer. t or fwhich of the following is not a from agi deduction? a.standard deductionb.itemized deductionc.personal exemptiond.none of these. all of these are from agi deductions

Gdp has grown in a country at 3% per year for the last 20 years. the labor force has grown at 2% per year and the quantity of physical capital has grown at 4% per year. a 1% increase in average physical capital per worker (other things equal) raises productivity by 0.3%. average education has not changed. how much has growing physical capital per worker contributed to productivity growth in this country? choose the correct answer from the following choices, and then select the submit answer button. answer choices 0.3% 0.6% 3.0% 6.0%

1. consider a two-firm industry. firm 1 (the incumbent) chooses a level of output qı. firm 2 (the potential entrant) observes qı and then chooses its level of output q2. the demand for the product is p 100 q, where q is the total output sold by the two firms which equals qi +q2. assume that the marginal cost of each firm is zero. a) find the subgame perfect equilibrium levels of qi and q2 keeping in mind that firm 1 chooses qi first and firm 2 observes qi and chooses its q2. find the profits of the two firms-n1 and t2- in the subgame perfect equilibrium. how do these numbers differ from the cournot equilibrium? b) for what level of qi would firm 2 be deterred from entering? would a rational firm 1 have an incentive to choose this level of qi? which entry condition does this market have: blockaded, deterred, or accommodated? now suppose that firm 2 has to incur a fixed cost of entry, f> 0. c) for what values of f will entry be blockaded? d) find out the entry deterring level of q, denoted by q1', a expression for firm l's profit, when entry is deterred, as a function of f. for what values of f would firm 1 use an entry deterring strategy?