If shawn can produce donuts at a lower opportunity cost than sue, then
(a) shawn has a comparative advantage in the production of donuts.
(b) sue has a comparative advantage in the production of donuts.
(c) shawn should not produce donuts.
(d) shawn is capable of producing more donuts than sue in a given amount of time

(A) Shawn has a comparative advantage in the production of donuts.

Explanation:

Shawn renounce to less goods than Sue when producing donuts.

This meas, Shawn has a comparative advantage in the production of donuts as their cost from the economic point of view are lower.

This do not imply that Sue cannot outproduce Shawn, it means it cost her more than Shawn

For example, if Sue produce 10 Donuts, but to produce donuts resing to produce 20 of other goods, each donut has an opportunity cost of 2

While Shawn can produce 8 donuts and resing to produce 8 of other goods:

each donut has an opportunity cost of 1

Therefore, is better for the overall economy to Shawn produce donuts and trade with Sue for the other good.

x=3

step-by-step explanation:

this is really simple i saw that there was only one term (5x) and thought if that was 15 what would i have to multiply everything else to get it there? well if 5x became 15 then x would have to be 3 so plug the 3 in the x for the other equations and you get 15 for the other ones. so there you go. : )

answer; risk transference;