You are shopping for a new printer to take back to college with you. you decide on the pixma ip100 due to its superior photo print quality and are now looking for the best price. different stores have different deals, plus the manufacturer was offering a $30 mail-in post-purchase rebate. you determined from the canon website that the msrp for the printer was $299 but one online store had it listed for $279. that price included free shipping, which you figured was at least a $20 savings. in addition, the seller included a usb cord necessary to connect the printer to your laptop, which was priced at $25 on canon's website. while the online store paid for shipping, there was a $5 fee to insure the printer during shipping. the online store did take trade-ins of old printers, but you didn't have any used printers to trade anyway. finally, the online store offered a special holiday coupon on this printer that was good for an additional $10 off the price of the printer. how much profit did the online store make on the sale of this printer? a) $92b) $82c) $102

Cooper sues company a in state court in south carolina, where he lives, for negligence alleging personal injury and property damage of $100,000 after a truck driven by an employee of company a rear-ended his pickup truck. company a is incorporated in delaware, has its headquarters in new york, but does a substantial amount of business in south carolina. claiming diversity of citizenship, company a seeks removal to federal district court, but cooper opposes the motion. which of the following is true regarding whether the case may be properly removed to federal district court? the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements; and if company a's nerve center is in a state other than south carolina, then the case may be properly removed to federal court.the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements; and because company a is incorporated and has its headquarters in a state other than south carolina, the case may be properly removed to federal court.because the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements and company a is incorporated in a state other than south carolina, the case may be properly removed to federal court regardless of where company a's headquarters, nerve center, or principal place of business is located.because the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements and company a is headquartered in a state other than south carolina, the case may be properly removed to federal court regardless of where company a is incorporated and regardless of the location of its nerve center.because the amount in controversy fails to satisfy jurisdictional requirements, regardless of the location of company a, the case may not be removed to federal court.