Business, 20.09.2019 16:10 jacob12049

Puppy woes. sam promised to sell linda a welsh corgi puppy for $300 but backed out of the deal. linda sued sam in state court for breach of contract. linda asked for a jury in her complaint. during jury selection, one juror, ann, said that she did not think they could be fair to linda because linda did not appear to be a dog lover. linda asked that ann not hear the case, and the judge excused ann. linda also decided that another juror, sandy, looked at her in a grumpy manner so she asked the judge to excuse that juror from serving. the judge did so. after the jury was chosen, linda made a statement to the jury, as did sam. linda then called to the witness stand a friend of hers, brenda, who heard the discussion held between linda and sam regarding the purchase of the puppy. brenda testified under questioning by linda that she heard linda say that she would pay $300 for the puppy and that she also heard sam say that he would sell the dog for that amount. unfortunately for linda, brenda also testified in response to questioning by sam that sam distinctly told linda that he would only sell the puppy to her if linda came with cash for the puppy within seven days. linda did not show up with the money for ten days and sam had already sold the dog to someone else. the judge ruled in favor of sam. the challenge to the juror who said that they could not be fair is referred to as a(n):

Answers: 2

Show answers

Another question on Business

Business, 21.06.2019 18:40

Which of the following is most likely to lead to a general decrease in wages? a. elastic demand b. public goods c. an economic recovery d. immigration 2b2t

Answers: 1

Answer

Business, 21.06.2019 21:00

Jurvin enterprises is a manufacturing company that had no beginning inventories. a subset of the transactions that it recorded during a recent month is shown below. $76,700 in raw materials were purchased for cash. $71,400 in raw materials were used in production. of this amount, $66,300 was for direct materials and the remainder was for indirect materials. total labor wages of $151,700 were incurred and paid. of this amount, $134,300 was for direct labor and the remainder was for indirect labor. additional manufacturing overhead costs of $126,300 were incurred and paid. manufacturing overhead of $126,800 was applied to production using the company's predetermined overhead rate. all of the jobs in process at the end of the month were completed. all of the completed jobs were shipped to customers. any underapplied or overapplied overhead for the period was closed to cost of goods sold.required: 1. post the above transactions to t-accounts.2. determine the cost of goods sold for the period.

Answers: 1

Answer

Business, 22.06.2019 01:00

Paar corporation bought 100 percent of kimmel, inc., on january 1, 2012. on that date, paarâ€™s equipment (10-year life) has a book value of $420,000 but a fair value of $520,000. kimmel has equipment (10-year life) with a book value of $272,000 but a fair value of $400,000. paar uses the equity method to record its investment in kimmel. on december 31, 2014, paar has equipment with a book value of $294,000 but a fair value of $445,200. kimmel has equipment with a book value of $190,400 but a fair value of $357,000. the consolidated balance for the equipment account as of december 31, 2014 is $574,000. what would be the impact on consolidated balance for the equipment account as of december 31, 2014 if the parent had applied the initial value method rather than the equity method? the balance in the consolidated equipment account cannot be determined for the initial value method using the information given. the consolidated equipment account would have a higher reported balance. the consolidated equipment account would have a lower reported balance. no effect: the method the parent uses is for internal reporting purposes only and has no impact on consolidated totals.

Answers: 2

Answer

Business, 22.06.2019 14:40

Nell and kirby are in the process of negotiating their divorce agreement. what should be the tax consequences to nell and kirby if the following, considered individually, became part of the agreement? a. in consideration for her one-half interest in their personal residence, kirby will transfer to nell stock with a value of $200,000 and $50,000 of cash. kirby's cost of the stock was $150,000, and the value of the personal residence is $500,000. they purchased the residence three years ago for $300,000.nell's basis for the stock is $ xkirby's basis in the house is $ xb. nell will receive $1,000 per month for 120 months. if she dies before receiving all 120 payments, the remaining payments will be made to her estate.the payments (qualify, do not qualify) as alimony and are (included in, excluded from) nell's gross income as they are received.c. nell is to have custody of their 12-year-old son, bobby. she is to receive $1,200 per month until bobby (1) dies or (2) attains age 21 (whichever occurs first). after either of these events occurs, nell will receive only $300 per month for the remainder of her life.$ x per month is alimony that is (included in, excluded from) nell's gross income, and the remaining $ x per month is considered (child support, property settlement) and is (nontaxable, taxable) to nell.

Answers: 3

Answer

You know the right answer?

Puppy woes. sam promised to sell linda a welsh corgi puppy for $300 but backed out of the deal. lind...

Questions